Journal cover Journal topic
Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems An open-access peer-reviewed journal
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • CiteScore value: 1.36 CiteScore
    1.36
  • SNIP value: 0.884 SNIP 0.884
  • IPP value: 1.15 IPP 1.15
  • SJR value: 0.276 SJR 0.276
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 7 Scimago H
    index 7
  • h5-index value: 11 h5-index 11
JSSS | Articles | Volume 9, issue 1
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 9, 51–60, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-9-51-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: Sensors and Measurement Systems 2019

J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 9, 51–60, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-9-51-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Regular research article 21 Feb 2020

Regular research article | 21 Feb 2020

Determination of the single point uncertainty of customized polymer gear wheels using structured-light scanning with various polygonization settings

Andreas Michael Müller et al.

Related authors

Determination of the single point precision associated with tactile gear measurements in scanning mode
Andreas Michael Müller and Tino Hausotte
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 9, 61–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-9-61-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-9-61-2020, 2020
Short summary
Data fusion of surface data sets of X-ray computed tomography measurements using locally determined surface quality values
Andreas Michael Müller and Tino Hausotte
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 7, 551–557, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-551-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-551-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Measurement theory, uncertainty and modeling of measurements: Measurement uncertainty
Determination of the single point precision associated with tactile gear measurements in scanning mode
Andreas Michael Müller and Tino Hausotte
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 9, 61–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-9-61-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-9-61-2020, 2020
Short summary
Uncertainty evaluation in industrial pressure measurement
Nadine Schiering and Olaf Schnelle-Werner
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 8, 251–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-251-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-251-2019, 2019
Short summary
Amplitude–phase calibration of tri-axial accelerometers in the low-frequency range by a LDV
Giulio D'Emilia, Antonella Gaspari, and Emanuela Natale
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 8, 223–231, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-223-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-223-2019, 2019
Short summary
Calibration of torque measurement under constant rotation in a wind turbine test bench
Paula Weidinger, Gisa Foyer, Stefan Kock, Jonas Gnauert, and Rolf Kumme
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 8, 149–159, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-149-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-8-149-2019, 2019
Short summary
Modeling the unified measurement uncertainty of deflectometric and plenoptic 3-D sensors
Mathias Ziebarth, Niclas Zeller, Michael Heizmann, and Franz Quint
J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 7, 517–533, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-517-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-517-2018, 2018
Short summary

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper aims to demonstrate the complete workflow of the determination of the local measurement uncertainty and its components (systematic and random measurement error) for a given measurement task. It was shown for an optical measurement setup in combination with an industrial X-ray computed tomography reference measurement system that different necessary colouring methods of polymer gear wheels have a measurable influence on the local distribution of the measurement uncertainty.
This paper aims to demonstrate the complete workflow of the determination of the local...
Citation