Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-373-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-373-2018
Regular research article
 | 
09 May 2018
Regular research article |  | 09 May 2018

Field evaluation of a low-cost indoor air quality monitor to quantify exposure to pollutants in residential environments

Alejandro Moreno-Rangel, Tim Sharpe, Filbert Musau, and Gráinne McGill

Viewed

Total article views: 5,867 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
3,694 2,101 72 5,867 94 101
  • HTML: 3,694
  • PDF: 2,101
  • XML: 72
  • Total: 5,867
  • BibTeX: 94
  • EndNote: 101
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,983 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,940 with geography defined and 43 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
We compared the temperature, relative humidity, total volatile organic compounds, carbon dioxide equivalents, and fine particulate matter measurements from Foobot to highly accurate instruments. The results suggest that Foobot offers a relatively low-cost and straightforward solution for identifying high pollutant exposures with potential health risks and for providing data at high granularity. Foobot characteristics make it a useful tool to evaluate occupant pollutant exposure.